Sub_aground4

Sub_aground4.jpg

Comments

  • Anonymous coward on 2006-Jan-11 21:21:43 Anonymous coward said

    mb
    Hurry up and cover that thing up....the sattelites are comming!
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Feb-09 11:44:45 Anonymous coward said

    slippery
    Good thing we have the new energy absorbing bumpers
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Aug-24 22:08:36 Anonymous coward said

    Kidney24
    All these comments on all the subs pictures, yet not one word of condolence for the crew members who all died a cold and slow death. What about the mums dads etc of these crew members? the4y may be Russians but they are human like us, have respect for these poor people.
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Sep-14 09:04:00 Anonymous coward said

    .
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Greeneville_(SSN-772)
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Oct-31 16:11:09 Anonymous coward said

    PDelta41
    Before you go posting links, consider that most people on the internet
    don't understand that language. However, that is not the Greeneville, as it never sustained damage of this magnitute.
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Oct-31 16:12:05 Anonymous coward said

    PDelta41
    The Greenville's history can be seen here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Greeneville_(SSN-772)
    However, this is a different class of sub. (Just look at the tower in the previous pic, if you don't believe me, and compare to the Greeneville's on the pedia site.)
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Oct-31 16:19:27 Anonymous coward said

    PDelta41
    This is the USS San Francisco after running aground south of guam.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_San_Francisco_%28SSN-711%29
  • Anonymous coward on 2007-Oct-31 16:23:42 Anonymous coward said

    PDelta41
    The accident involved an improperly charted seamount and resulted in one death and injury to 23 sailors.

advertisements

Photo info

Popular tags

Random image